We recently attended the 2026 Nonprofit Technology Conference (NTC26), one of the premier gatherings for nonprofit professionals navigating the intersection of technology, equity, and mission-driven work. Over three days of keynotes, sessions, and peer conversations, we walked away energized and full of ideas. Here are the themes and insights that stood out most.
One of the most memorable sessions challenged the common assumption that AI is simply a productivity tool to work faster. Presenters Beth Kanter and Enzo Duit made a compelling case that the real danger of AI is not job replacement — it is cognitive offloading. Research shows that when we stop engaging our brains in first-draft thinking, our capacity for independent thought can actually decline.
The framework they recommended: human first, AI second, human filter third. That means you bring your own ideas and outline to the table first, use AI to iterate and improve, and then apply your own judgment to the final result. Even something as simple as handwriting notes before collaborating with AI can make a meaningful difference in how deeply you engage with your own work.
Sean Flahie’s session on Microsoft 365 blind spots was a wake-up call. Many nonprofits are overpaying for licenses they don’t fully use and underutilizing tools already in their subscription. A few of the most common issues he flagged:
The message: think of Microsoft 365 as a connected ecosystem, not a collection of separate tools. Small improvements across licensing, security, and adoption can compound into significant time and cost savings.
New research shared at the conference put numbers to something many of us feel: 82% of mission-driven professionals say disconnected systems contribute to burnout, and nearly half report wasting time on repetitive, manual tasks. Perhaps most alarming, 63% of those experiencing tech-driven burnout are actively considering leaving their organizations.
The opportunity here is real. When you focus AI on the tasks that drain capacity — data entry, manual reporting, disconnected workflows — you free up staff to do the work that actually matters: building relationships, serving clients, and advancing the mission. The call to action is not just to adopt new tools, but to evaluate your tech stack as a workforce investment.
Multiple sessions throughout the conference returned to a consistent theme: closing the digital divide requires more than getting devices into people’s hands. It requires digital literacy, culturally responsive programming, and community-driven design.
A standout example came from a partnership between Boys & Girls Clubs and STEAM in AI, where students in underserved communities did not just learn technical skills — they developed confidence as ethical innovators. The session on public interest technology echoed this: digital literacy is not just a workforce skill, it is a prerequisite for civic participation in the 21st century. And critically, AI ethics needs to be part of the classroom conversation — not just instruction on how to use the tools, but on the values and responsibilities that come with them.
For nonprofits, the question to lead with is not “what technology can we deploy?” — it’s ”how does this serve the community?”
One of the most practically useful sessions tackled a challenge that is universal in nonprofits: the disconnect between leadership decisions and frontline realities. The team at COMPASS Youth Collaborative shared how they built a culture of transparency and genuine inclusivity — not just communicating decisions better, but actually incorporating more voices into the decision-making process.
A key insight: collecting more feedback is not useful until you start tracking it for trends. The volume can feel overwhelming at first, but patterns emerge quickly — and those patterns become one of the most valuable inputs you have for any decision that affects your team.
A session on prioritization and delegation hit close to home for many nonprofit leaders in the room. The core premise: capacity constraints are one of the most common enemies of progress in this sector, but they are not inevitable. The session introduced several practical tools for leaders who find themselves buried in administrative, marketing, and project management work.
Three strategies stood out:
The reminder that resonated most: asking for help is not a sign of weakness. It is a leadership skill.
The change readiness session reframed something many of us think of as an enterprise-level discipline into something relevant for organizations of every size. The core argument: structured change management is not only for large-scale rollouts — it is the thing that allows teams to stay coordinated and calm when the unexpected happens.
The simplest version of the message was also the most memorable: fix the process, not the people. When things go wrong, the instinct is often to focus on who dropped the ball. But in most cases, the real culprit is a workflow, a tool, or a communication gap. Build systems that set people up to succeed, take feedback seriously, and act on it — and your team will be more resilient when change comes whether you planned for it or not.
Final Thoughts
The themes across NTC26 were clear: technology is most powerful when it puts people first. Whether you are evaluating your Microsoft 365 setup, rethinking how AI fits into your workflows, building capacity on your team, or designing digital literacy programs for your community, the starting question is the same — who does this serve, and how?
We are energized to bring these ideas back to our work. If any of these themes resonate with challenges you are facing, we would love to talk.